HP:GoF

Over the week­end, Ariesna & I went with some friends to watch Harry Pot­ter and the Gob­let of Fire. I went into the movie with extremely low expec­ta­tions1 but much to my sur­prise; I rather liked the movie. Sure huge chunks of the book were wacked out, but you have to expect that when you are tak­ing 734 pages of text and con­vert­ing it into a movie just over 2.5 hours long. The spe­cial effects were upto pair with any­thing in the prior movies. Also, although the actor play­ing Mad-Eye Moody didn’t look quite like I had pic­tured the char­ac­ter; he did a nice job of it. Over­all, I give this one a thumbs up and it will even­tu­ally be going in my DVD col­lec­tion (unlike some the pre­vi­ous one).

1 Harry Pot­ter and the Pris­oner of Azk­a­ban was such a wretched film that it nearly ruined the entire series for me.

Similar Posts

  • Welcome back, Potter!
    Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (Book 6) My rating: 4 out of 5. After a two year wait, Ms. R ...
  • The Dark Is Rising
    The Dark Is Rising sequence is a set of 5 books1 written by Susan Cooper between 1965 and 1977. It i ...
  • Meme of Books
    Number of Books on the Shelf Depends on the shelf and I don't really have any good idea of how many ...
  • Transformers — it friggin rocks, NOT
    Errm, no. Sorry, this movie did not rock. There were good bits and bad bits to this movie. Good Use ...
  • How many have you watched?
    Just a quick meme idea that occured to me. Below I've listed the top 100 movies (according to IMDB.c ...

About Mark McKibben

Mark works as a [REDACTED] for [REDACTED], currently residing in Iowa. CoffeeBear.net is a place for him to blather on about whatever strikes his fancy. He currently spends his "free" time working on a photography project, playing with his cat and attempting to keep his wife happy (not necessarily in that order).

6 Comments

  1. ken says:
    November 28th, 2005 at 4:10 pm

    Because you let stu­pid gits like me to write opin­ions, I’ll offer one (or four). I’d order the HP series, in order of Goy­ley good­ness, best first, could this sen­tence get any more run-on, as follows:

    1. HP4
    2. HP3
    3. HP2
    4. HP1

    HP4: Good story, good pace with­out seem­ing rushed, they deleted the most deletable things and kept the good bits, and they elim­i­nated the two most unbear­able things about the series …

    HP3: Like John Henry, Ron Weasley took on what­sis­name (the house elf) to deter­mine once and for all whether nat­ural tal­ent, or CGI, could pro­duce the most irri­tat­ing non-stop whin­ing. Ron’s god-awful last-nerve moan­ing reached its peak in HP3, and the con­test ended in a tie. This would have been Booth’s bul­let — ruin­ing the play for me — except that every­one else’s act­ing had got­ten bet­ter, the pace and direct­ing was good for a change, and there were huge blocks of very good movie fea­tur­ing nei­ther one of the contestants.

    HP2: I’d stick it in the same class as HP1, except that they snapped it up a little.

    HP1: I really believe that some­one could take this film and pull a Star Trek I on it, delet­ing about 50 min­utes of dull­ness from it to make it a much bet­ter movie. Rick­man (Snape) was eas­ily the best aspect of this film, which was oth­er­wise just okay in my book.

  2. Mark says:
    November 28th, 2005 at 11:13 pm

    Ok, a cou­ple quick replies:
    1. I’m curi­ous as to what you felt were the two most unbear­able things about the series.
    2. I thought HP1 was bet­ter than 2, but the edit­ing job was hor­rid. If they’d included some of the deleted scenes (espe­cially Harry first Potions class) instead of other scenes they included it would have been a much stronger film.
    3. You actu­ally LIKED the third HP movie? *gack* The direct­ing stunk. They killed Ron’s char­ac­ter by giv­ing all his best lines to Hermione. Then there’s that, that thing the spe­cial effects crew claimed was a were­wolf. Not too men­tion Herimone’s “Aaaa­wooooo”. *dou­ble gack*

  3. Mark says:
    November 28th, 2005 at 11:21 pm

    BTW, the house-elf you are refer­ring to is most likely Dobby. Per IMDB.com, he was voiced by Toby Jones.

  4. ken says:
    November 29th, 2005 at 3:31 pm

    The most unbear­able, but appar­ently not unCOF­FEE­bear­able, thing(s) about the series were the char­ac­ters:
    – Dobby the House-Elf,
    – Ron Weasley in HP3.

    My guess is the actor who played Ron had a coach who could only hear dia­logue pitched for dogs, and told him to “annoy-it-up” after both HP1 and 2. As for Dobby, in addi­tion to hav­ing a fairly cen­tral char­ac­ter be an unnat­u­rally mov­ing CGI, I’d guess the direc­tor told him to not sound human, so he shot for lobster-boiling-in-water.

    I can only guess fan-mail received after HP3 included com­ments like, “P.S.: Tell Ron and Dobby to quit being annoy­ing. They caus­ing my dog pain.” Luck­ily, the advice was taken in HP4, and they cut Dobby entirely.

    I don’t think I’ve seen deleted scenes — I just have impres­sions from a sin­gle watch­ing of each movie (except HP1, which I think I saw on DVD as well).

    HP3 had pros and cons, but I still liked it (despite it con­tain­ing the afore­men­tioned most-objectionable-material-of-the-series). It had more inter­est­ing, and more depth, to char­ac­ters. I’d for­got­ten Hermione’s howl, thanks a lot for remind­ing me (bleah). But still, com­pared to the mind-bendingly slow HP1, and Ken­neth Branagh’s — unfor­tu­nately prob­a­bly accu­rate — por­trayal of a car­i­ca­ture in HP2 (along with Ron really obvi­ously begin­ning to equate “punch­able” with “act­ing”), HP3 had more redeem­ing qual­i­ties to it than faults. This includes a bet­ter plot to work with to begin with.

  5. Mark says:
    November 29th, 2005 at 6:24 pm

    Sorry for bring­ing up the painful mem­o­ries *grin*. And it’s true that HP3 had a bet­ter plot to work with; it’s just a shame they slaugh­tered most of the plot the way they did.

    Going back to deleted scenes, you really should look into watch­ing at least some of the deleted scenes (par­tic­u­larly on HP1). That first Potions class with Snape is amaz­ing. It’s a real shame they cut that from the final release. Some of the rest are good as well, but that scene in par­tic­u­lar was brilliant.

  6. Aaron says:
    March 20th, 2006 at 1:36 am

    HP3 almost sucked, but than they made sir­ius look JUST LIKE Charles Man­son. That alone saved the whole movie for me.

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.