<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lucky Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coffeebear.net/2009/03/13/lucky-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coffeebear.net/2009/03/13/lucky-day/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://coffeebear.net/2009/03/13/lucky-day/comment-page-1/#comment-24946</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeebear.net/?p=842#comment-24946</guid>
		<description>Well the vulnkey tool&#039;s been out for a while and still says my keys were clean.  *shrug* I guess since my new keys are working fine the why is not all that important (ran across numerous threads of people continuing to have problems after the upgrade).

As for &lt;a href=&quot;http://coffeebear.net/library/jean-m-auel/the-clan-of-the-cave-bear/&quot; title=&quot;Clan of the Cave Bear &#124; Jean M. Auel &#124; Library &#124; CoffeeBear.net&quot;&gt;CofCB&lt;/a&gt;, all I knew before I read it was there was a movie of it when I was a kid. A movie I wasn&#039;t allowed to watch and when I was a kid I had a hankering to see. As I turned into the old man I am today, I forgot about it. Then at the last &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crlibrary.org/&quot;&gt;CRPL&lt;/a&gt; annual book sale I found a copy. As they sell books at $5 per box, I figured what the heck and picked it up. Having now read the book, I can say it&#039;s much better than Flintstone porn but I can see how people might hold that opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the vulnkey tool’s been out for a while and still says my keys were clean.  *shrug* I guess since my new keys are working fine the why is not all that important (ran across numerous threads of people continuing to have problems after the upgrade).</p>
<p>As for <a href="http://coffeebear.net/library/jean-m-auel/the-clan-of-the-cave-bear/" title="Clan of the Cave Bear | Jean M. Auel | Library | CoffeeBear.net">CofCB</a>, all I knew before I read it was there was a movie of it when I was a kid. A movie I wasn’t allowed to watch and when I was a kid I had a hankering to see. As I turned into the old man I am today, I forgot about it. Then at the last <a href="http://www.crlibrary.org/">CRPL</a> annual book sale I found a copy. As they sell books at $5 per box, I figured what the heck and picked it up. Having now read the book, I can say it’s much better than Flintstone porn but I can see how people might hold that opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://coffeebear.net/2009/03/13/lucky-day/comment-page-1/#comment-24945</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeebear.net/?p=842#comment-24945</guid>
		<description>I had some keys that were ok when the vulnkey tool was first release, but were tagged as compromised a few weeks later. I think their net got wider as the crypto kids figured out what their data set encompassed.

P.S-- CotCB? Honestly? It&#039;s the Flintstones with porn, you know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had some keys that were ok when the vulnkey tool was first release, but were tagged as compromised a few weeks later. I think their net got wider as the crypto kids figured out what their data set encompassed.</p>
<p>P.S– CotCB? Honestly? It’s the Flintstones with porn, you know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://coffeebear.net/2009/03/13/lucky-day/comment-page-1/#comment-24943</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeebear.net/?p=842#comment-24943</guid>
		<description>I thought of that and checked my keys with &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.debian.org/SSLkeys#Testingkeysusingssh-vulnkey&quot; title=&quot;SSLkeys - Debian Wiki&quot;&gt;ssh-vulnkey&lt;/a&gt; but it told me they were not blacklisted. So I wouldn&#039;t say that was the problem but I don&#039;t know for sure as that does seem like the most likely cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought of that and checked my keys with <a href="http://wiki.debian.org/SSLkeys#Testingkeysusingssh-vulnkey" title="SSLkeys - Debian Wiki">ssh-vulnkey</a> but it told me they were not blacklisted. So I wouldn’t say that was the problem but I don’t know for sure as that does seem like the most likely cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://coffeebear.net/2009/03/13/lucky-day/comment-page-1/#comment-24942</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeebear.net/?p=842#comment-24942</guid>
		<description>So, was the SSH keys debacle due to the &quot;blacklisted&quot; Debian keys? Debian had a predictable crypto vulnerability a while back, and any keys made during that window have been revoked. And since Ubuntu is downstream from Debian, you probably caught it. I think there was a flag you could use to for ssh to use the key with a warning ... but rebuilding them is still the best option. A pain, to be sure, but security always is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, was the SSH keys debacle due to the “blacklisted” Debian keys? Debian had a predictable crypto vulnerability a while back, and any keys made during that window have been revoked. And since Ubuntu is downstream from Debian, you probably caught it. I think there was a flag you could use to for ssh to use the key with a warning … but rebuilding them is still the best option. A pain, to be sure, but security always is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manzabar (Mark)</title>
		<link>http://coffeebear.net/2009/03/13/lucky-day/comment-page-1/#comment-24940</link>
		<dc:creator>manzabar (Mark)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 07:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeebear.net/?p=842#comment-24940</guid>
		<description>New blog post: Lucky Day http://tinyurl.com/dh4uvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New blog post: Lucky Day <a href="http://tinyurl.com/dh4uvj">http://tinyurl.com/dh4uvj</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/14 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 570/581 objects using disk: basic

Served from: coffeebear.net @ 2012-02-11 03:44:14 -->
