<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dvorak vs. Creative Commons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coffeebear.net/archives/2005/07/19/dvorak-vs-creative-commons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coffeebear.net/archives/2005/07/19/dvorak-vs-creative-commons/</link>
	<description>The world is safe because I'm Chaotic Good,not Lawful Evil
</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://coffeebear.net/archives/2005/07/19/dvorak-vs-creative-commons/#comment-21137</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 20:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeebear.net/?p=322#comment-21137</guid>
		<description>I've started listening to old epsiodes of Escape Pod and in &lt;a href="http://www.escapepod.org/2005/07/21/ep011-herd-mentality/" title="Herd Mentality" rel="nofollow"&gt;EP011: Herd Mentality&lt;/a&gt; Stephen Eley has a rant about this very issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've started listening to old epsiodes of Escape Pod and in <a href="http://www.escapepod.org/2005/07/21/ep011-herd-mentality/" title="Herd Mentality" >EP011: Herd Mentality</a> Stephen Eley has a rant about this very issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Hogan</title>
		<link>http://coffeebear.net/archives/2005/07/19/dvorak-vs-creative-commons/#comment-18820</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeebear.net/?p=322#comment-18820</guid>
		<description>Yeah I was rather disappointed with Dvorak's assessment here... this article really shook my faith in his competency</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I was rather disappointed with Dvorak's assessment here... this article really shook my faith in his competency</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: incoherently.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Creative Carping</title>
		<link>http://coffeebear.net/archives/2005/07/19/dvorak-vs-creative-commons/#comment-11336</link>
		<dc:creator>incoherently.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Creative Carping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 05:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeebear.net/?p=322#comment-11336</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: seems I&#8217;m not the only one who has noticed Dvorak&#8217;s assumed tome on CC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: seems I&#8217;m not the only one who has noticed Dvorak&#8217;s assumed tome on CC. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://coffeebear.net/archives/2005/07/19/dvorak-vs-creative-commons/#comment-11289</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeebear.net/?p=322#comment-11289</guid>
		<description>Yesterday, the Register posted a fairly decent &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.com/2005/07/21/creativity/" title="On Creativity, Computers and Copyright &#124; The Register" rel="nofollow"&gt;response&lt;/a&gt; to Mr. Dvorak's rantings.  Though Mr. Orlowski displays a definite naivete, when he claims: &lt;blockquote&gt;Want to use a sample? Go ahead and use it. With a nudge and a wink, you'll probably get away with it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;  In today's increasingly litigious society and with the increasing power of computers; we're quickly moving into a world where you definitely won't get away with it regardless if you make it into a chart topping it or only share it on you website with your 6 closest friends.  If your derivative work is online; then it is only a matter of time before a webcrawler indexes it for somebody's search engine.  Once the work has been indexed; with the ever increasing power of tomorrow's computers, the time it takes a record label to find &#038; sue you is shrinking to an infinitesimal amount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, the Register posted a fairly decent <a href="http://www.theregister.com/2005/07/21/creativity/" title="On Creativity, Computers and Copyright | The Register" >response</a> to Mr. Dvorak's rantings.  Though Mr. Orlowski displays a definite naivete, when he claims:<br />
<blockquote>Want to use a sample? Go ahead and use it. With a nudge and a wink, you'll probably get away with it.</p></blockquote>
<p>  In today's increasingly litigious society and with the increasing power of computers; we're quickly moving into a world where you definitely won't get away with it regardless if you make it into a chart topping it or only share it on you website with your 6 closest friends.  If your derivative work is online; then it is only a matter of time before a webcrawler indexes it for somebody's search engine.  Once the work has been indexed; with the ever increasing power of tomorrow's computers, the time it takes a record label to find &#038; sue you is shrinking to an infinitesimal amount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everybody loves Eric Raymond &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Everybody loves John Dvorak</title>
		<link>http://coffeebear.net/archives/2005/07/19/dvorak-vs-creative-commons/#comment-10899</link>
		<dc:creator>Everybody loves Eric Raymond &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Everybody loves John Dvorak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeebear.net/?p=322#comment-10899</guid>
		<description>[...] Coffee Bear [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Coffee Bear [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
