FAQ to Hell

One of my co-workers/friends went to Hell* recently and upon his return sent out this FAQ regard­ing his visit.

Is there a high­way to Hell?
Yes. It is Michi­gan county road D-32. And yes, I was also dis­ap­pointed with this des­ig­na­tion. For fun, the res­i­dents of Hell like to call the high­way Route 666, but appar­ently the offi­cials of Liv­ingston County don’t have a sense of humor.

Is the road to Hell really paved with good inten­tions?
Yes. But, not sur­pris­ingly, good inten­tions look and feel a lot like asphalt.

Is Hell under-ground?
The vil­lage of Hell is not under-ground. Or, at least the tourist spots aren’t. It’s pos­si­ble that the shop I stopped in had a back way to the under-ground areas of Hell, but appar­ently I didn’t have secu­rity clear­ance to see that.

Isn’t it true that once you enter Hell, you can never leave?
Yes, unless you are awarded an exit visa. In order to secure an exit visa, all you have to do is buy some­thing in Hell’s gift shop.

Uh… that doesn’t make sense. If all it took to get out of Hell was to buy a hokey sou­venir, wouldn’t tor­tured souls be leav­ing Hell in droves?
Tor­tured souls don’t have money. Duh. And besides, what can be more tor­tur­ous than know­ing that you could escape Hell if only you had one lousy dol­lar to buy a “See You In Hell” refrig­er­a­tor mag­net? (There is one the­olo­gian who believes that Hell exit visas did, in fact, result in a mass exo­dus from Hell in 1992, explain­ing the unusu­ally high num­ber of peo­ple who, in the pres­i­den­tial elec­tion that year, voted for Ross Perot.)

What is the tem­per­a­ture of Hell?
This is a very impor­tant ques­tion, as peo­ple are con­stantly say­ing things like, “It’s hot­ter than Hell” or “It’s colder than Hell”, clearly with­out know­ing what they are talk­ing about. The truth is, the tem­per­a­ture in the vil­lage of Hell varies, like the rest of Michi­gan, with the sea­sons. This makes sense when you think about it. Noth­ing says “Hell” like not know­ing what to wear in the spring and fall.

Did you see any demons?
Since demons typ­i­cally move about in dis­guise, this is an impos­si­ble ques­tion to answer. I did see a guy dri­ving a pickup with a “Perot in ‘04” bumper-sticker on it, though.

Did you meet Satan?
No. Con­trary to pop­u­lar belief, Satan does not reside in Hell. No rock stars were liv­ing there either. Not above-ground, anyway.

Did Hell look any­thing like Dante’s Inferno?
Dante’s Inferno is a work of fic­tion. I sup­pose it’s pos­si­ble that the under-ground areas of Hell, if they exist, might look like Dante’s descrip­tion of Hell. But I have no rea­son to believe Dante would have mer­ited access to these areas while I would not. I’m a man­ager, for cripes sakes.

Did you see Cer­berus?
There is no gate to the vil­lage of Hell, and thus no three-headed dogs guard­ing it. If “lower regions” exist and there is a gate to these regions, I didn’t see it.

Did you see the river Styx?
Yes. But the locals call it Hell Creek. Hell creek is dammed (appro­pri­ately enough), cre­at­ing a lake that, I’m told, is very pleas­ant to swim in.

Do peo­ple who take a dip become immor­tal, like Achilles?
Nobody will say. When Achilles was killed, his mother, Thetis, filed a law­suit against Hades for false adver­tis­ing. Ever since then, the extra­or­di­nary qual­i­ties of Hell Creek have been down­played. I’d have tested it myself, but it was freez­ing when I was there, and liv­ing for­ever just didn’t seem worth it.

So did you see Hades, then?
No. Hades retired from pub­lic life not long after the Achilles scan­dal. He now runs a Hoot­ers restau­rant in Saginaw.

Were the peo­ple nice to you?
The peo­ple were extremely nice, as you would expect from a Mid­west­ern, small-town com­mu­nity. If this runs counter to your hell-logical sen­si­tiv­i­ties, then con­sider one of the fol­low­ing: either the res­i­dents of Hell are demons who wel­come a break from being cruel, or the res­i­dents of Hell are the human damned who wel­come the break from being tor­tured. I reckon they’re just good ‘ol Mid­west­ern folk, but I’m not going to force my reli­gious con­vic­tions on others.

Hell actu­ally sounds a lot more bor­ing than I imag­ined. Is it?
Admit­tedly, most of the fun in vis­it­ing Hell is in telling peo­ple you’ve been there. But isn’t that true about most places? How many times have you heard peo­ple vis­it­ing the Grand Canyon say, “This is it???” Sure… it hap­pens all the time. But I’ll visit Hell again. I thought it was fun.

Where do I get some of that pre­mium mer­chan­dise you brought back from your trip?
You can just go to Hell.

Or you can visit Hell’s web­site at www.hell2u.com.

* Hell, Michi­gan

Abortion

Given that I’m wait­ing for some fresh code to come back for me to test, I fig­ured I’d take a moment to post my view on the sub­ject. If you’re sen­si­tive to these sorts of issues and would just rather skip this post; stop read­ing now. Oth­er­wise, click more…

Read more

Air America Radio

As much as I love my iPod; some­times I get tired of lis­ten­ing to music and need some­thing else. Recently Air Amer­ica Radio started broad­cast­ing, though not yet in my area of the coun­try. For­tu­nately for me, they do have a live audio stream off their web­site. Ini­tially I was some­what upset by their choice to use RealPlayer, but like CarTalk and the BBC they’re pro­vid­ing links to directly down­load the free ver­sion. I ‘d sort of looked at down­load­ing the free ver­sion of RealPlayer when the BBC started this, but wasn’t impressed with the direct link they were offer­ing. How­ever from what I’d been hear­ing about Air Amer­ica, I really wanted to start lis­ten­ing to it. So I gave RealPlayer another chance and this time it really was a direct link and I soon had RealPlayer 10 installed on my sta­tion. Then I tuned into Air Amer­ica and have been lis­ten­ing to it all week long. Mostly I lis­ten to it in the after­noon and catch Randi Rhodes show, but this morn­ing I tuned in ear­lier and have been lis­ten­ing to Unfil­tered, which I like a lot better.

This morn­ing the Unfil­tered crew pointed out a rather dis­turb­ing quirk in our cur­rent tax code. If you’re self-employed and buy a Hum­mer (or some other 6,000+ lb. vehi­cle); you can deduct upto $100,000 of the cost of that vehi­cle from your taxes. On the other hand, if you buy a hybrid vehi­cle (such as the Toy­ota Prius) in 2004; you’ll get a $1,500 deduc­tion, next year it’ll only be $1,000, the year after $500. This totally encour­ages peo­ple to buy more mon­s­ter­ously waste­ful vehi­cles rather than envi­ron­men­tally friendly ones. I under­stand that the mas­sive cut on the big vehi­cles is intended to help busi­nesses, but shouldn’t it then be restricted to cer­tain types of vehi­cles or busi­nesses (i.e. farm equipment)?

If we restricted it more, then less peo­ple would be likely to buy more vehi­cle than they need, which might hurt the Hum­mer com­pany but would be bet­ter for our envi­ron­ment. And if at the same time we started restrict­ing what busi­nesses could get that mas­sive cut; we increased the deductible on hybrid and pos­si­bly even alter­na­tive fuel vehi­cles; it seems to me that we would enable the peo­ple who need to buy those mas­sive vehi­cles the means to do so while reduc­ing our depen­de­nacy on for­eign oil and the reduced emis­sions from the hybrids would help reduce the amount of dam­age we’re doing to the envi­ron­ment everyday.

For the record, I don’t own a hybrid yet but I’m seri­ously con­sid­er­ing one for my next car. Edmunds.com has an inter­est­ing arti­cle talk­ing about some of the hybrids that are com­ing out in the 2005 year. They’ve also got a bit of pre­view info on a Honda Accord hybrid that’s sup­posed to be com­ing out this fall, but I prob­a­bly won’t have the money for a new car for another year or two. I sup­pose it’s just as well; as I tend to avoid buy­ing new cars (due to the expense) and new cars in their first year as that’s the year I feel most bugs are found in the vehicle.

I’ve kind of wan­der around here a bit, so to sum up:

Survivor (part 2)

I fin­ished read­ing Chuck Palahniuk’s Sur­vivor last night and con­trary to my early thoughts on the book; I did end up sort of lik­ing the book. It’s not what I would call a good read at all, but rather the story seems to sud­denly get inter­est­ing once you’re about halfway through.

Kind of like you’re on a long road trip; it’s been rain­ing for the last hour; the sky sud­denly clears up, just in time to give you a per­fect view of a mas­sive, bloody car acci­dent up ahead. You don’t really want to look, but you do anyway.

Over­all, I’d say this book is worth 2.75 points out of 5.

For now, I’ve gone back to read­ing Mas­ter­pieces: The Best Sci­ence Fic­tion of the 20th Cen­tury and am roughly halfway through. So far none of the sto­ries in the col­lec­tion have been stinkers, but here’s plenty of read­ing left to do and no more time for writ­ing as I have to dash off to work.

Survivor

Yes­ter­day, a fiend friend tossed Chuck Palahniuk’s Sur­vivor at me and said it was a book that I had to read. Since Mas­ter­pieces is a col­lec­tion of short sto­ries; I fig­ured I’d humor him and read the book.

So far I’m only about 3–4 chap­ters in and I’m already wish­ing I’d told him to piss off. The book is gloomy and dreary, not at all my sort of read. Since I said I’d read it; read it I shall but this looks more like some­thing I’ll be strug­gling to fin­ish rather than rac­ing through it. I just don’t care for doom & gloom books all that much. Ah well, you win some; you lose some.

This work by Mark McKibben is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States.